Box 13: Cotton in the Sahel
Over the past 50 years, and particularly in the past two decades, cotton has become a
key export crop for many Sahelian countries. Although cotton is a plantation crop in the
European Union and the United States of America, in the Sahel it is grown almost
exclusively on small farms. Moreover, this success has not been achieved at the expense
of foregone cereal production. Cotton production has contributed to higher incomes,
improved livelihoods and better access to social services such as education and health.
Mali is one of the largest cotton producers in the region, and indeed in all of
sub-Saharan Africa. In 2006, roughly 200 000 Malian smallholder farmers produced cotton
for sale on the international market. Over the past 45 years, cotton production has
increased by more than 8 percent per year, providing an average income of US$200 per
household for over 25 percent of Malian rural households.
Mali’s cotton farmers traditionally cultivate cotton in rotation with coarse grains,
particularly maize and sorghum. Contrary to popular fears that cash crops may have a
negative effect on food-crop production and household food security, cotton production
has actually boosted coarse grain production in Mali. Unlike coarse grains produced
outside the cotton zone, cereals grown by cotton farmers benefit from greater access to
fertilizer and from the residual effects of cotton fertilizers procured and financed
through the region’s cotton-based input/credit system. Cereal fields also benefit from
improved farming practices made possible through the use of animal traction obtain
higher yields in both cotton and coarse grains than the semi-equipped and manual
producers (Dioné, 1989; Raymond and Fok 1995; Kébé, Diakite and Diawara, 1998).
Well-equipped cotton farmers, likewise, are more able to satisfy the demanding husbandry
requirements of maize production, including timely planting, frequent ploughing and
regular weeding (Boughton and de Frahan, 1994). They also tend to sell more cereals to
the markets. In general, farmers using animal traction account for the majority of
cereal sales, primarily because of their higher per capita production.
Historically, an important factor in the success of cotton farmers with both cotton
and cereals has been the extension support provided by the Compagnie Malienne de
Développement des Textiles (CMDT). The CMDT’s construction and maintenance of regional
feeder roads has also facilitated the collection and transport of seed cotton. This
benefits food-crop marketing by helping to lower marketing costs and improve market
integration in the zone. The Malian cotton experience highlights the importance of
investing in agriculture if biofuels are to become an engine of agricultural growth.
Cotton also illustrates the impact of OECD countries’ subsidies to production and
exports and tariffs on imports of farm-based commodities. Anderson and Valenzuela (2007)
estimate that the removal of current distortions affecting cotton markets would boost
global economic welfare by US$283 million per year and raise the price of cotton by
about 13 percent. Moreover, West African cotton farmer’s incomes would rise by 40
percent.
Source: based on Tefft (forthcoming).
Source: FAO, The State of Food and Agriculture, Biofuels: Prospects, Risks and Opportunities (2008) ,
Chapter 6, p.81
Related publication:
Other Figures & Tables on this publication:
TABLE 1: Biofuel production by country, 2007
TABLE 2: Biofuel yields for different feedstocks and countries
TABLE 3: Hypothetical potential for ethanol from principal cereal and sugar crops
TABLE 4: Voluntary and mandatory bioenergy targets for transport fuels in G8+5
countries
TABLE 5: Applied tariffs on ethanol in selected countries
TABLE 6: Total support estimates for biofuels in selected OECD economies in 2006
TABLE 7: Approximate average and variable rates of support per litre of biofuel in
selected OECD economies
TABLE 8: Energy demand by source and sector: reference scenario
TABLE 9: Land requirements for biofuel production
TABLE 10: Water requirements for biofuel crops
TABLE 11: Import bills of total food and major food commodities for 2007 and their
percentage increase over 2006
TABLE 12: Net importers of petroleum products and major cereals, ranked by
prevalence of undernourishment
TABLE 13: Share of net staple food-seller households among urban, rural and total
households
Box 1: Other types of biomass for heat, power and transport
Box 2: Biotechnology applications for biofuels
Box 3: Biofuel policies in Brazil
Box 4: Biofuel policies in the United States of America
Box 5: Biofuel policies in the European Union
Box 6: Main sources of uncertainty for biofuel projections
Box 7: Biofuels and the World Trade Organization
Box 8: Biofuels and preferential trade initiatives
Box 9: The Global Bioenergy Partnership
Box 10: Biofuels and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
Box 11: Jatropha – a “miracle” crop?
Box 12: Agricultural growth and poverty reduction
Box 13: Cotton in the Sahel
Box 14: Biofuel crops and the land issue in the United Republic of Tanzania
Figure 1: World primary energy demand by source, 2005
Figure 2: Total primary energy demand by source and region, 2005
Figure 3: Trends in consumption of transport biofuels
Figure 4: Biofuels – from feedstock to end use
Figure 5: Uses of biomass for energy
Figure 6: Conversion of agricultural feedstocks into liquid biofuels
Figure 7: Estimated ranges of fossil energy balances of selected fuel types
Figure 8: Support provided at different points in the biofuel supply chain
Figure 9: Biofuel production costs in selected countries, 2004 and 2007
Figure 10: Breakeven prices for crude oil and selected feedstocks in 2005
Figure 11: Breakeven prices for maize and crude oil in the United States of
America
Figure 12: Breakeven prices for maize and crude oil with and without subsidies
Figure 13: Maize and crude oil breakeven prices and observed prices, 2003–08
Figure 14: Price relationships between crude oil and other biofuel feedstocks,
2003-08
Figure 15: Food commodity price trends 1971–2007, with projections to 2017
Figure 16: Global ethanol production, trade and prices, with projections to 2017
Figure 17: Major ethanol producers, with projections to 2017
Figure 18: Global biodiesel production, trade and prices, with projections to 2017
Figure 19: Major biodiesel producers, with projections to 2017
Figure 20: Total impact of removing trade-distorting biofuel policies for ethanol,
2013–17 average
Figure 21: Total impact of removing trade-distorting biofuel policies for
biodiesel, 2013–17 average
Figure 22: Life-cycle analysis for greenhouse gas balances
Figure 23: Reductions in greenhouse gas emissions of selected biofuels relative to
fossil fuels
Figure 24: Potential for cropland expansion
Figure 25: Potential for yield increase for selected biofuel feedstock crops
Figure 26: Potential for irrigated area expansion
Figure 27: Agricultural trade balance of least-developed countries
Figure 28: Distribution of poor net buyers and sellers of staple foods1
Figure 29: Average welfare gain/loss from a 10 percent increase in the price of
the main staple, by income (expenditure) quintile for rural and urban households