Box 3.5 The business case for biodiversityThe “business case for biodiversity” is based on a company’s need to maintain its competitive advantage and long-term sustainability. While some businesses may choose to integrate biodiversity considerations into their practices because it is “the right thing to do” or simply as a public relations exercise, more and more companies, particularly those that heavily depend, or have major impacts, on biodiversity, are investing in biodiversity in order to sustain and improve their profits. In industries that have significant impacts on biodiversity, a company’s productivity, and often its competitive advantage, will be influenced by its biodiversity record, including: compliance with legal requirements; implementation of industry standards; response to demands from local communities, civil society groups and shareholders; and application of consumer-driven standards, such as certification schemes for timber and seafood. As societal expectations and legal requirements increasingly favour biodiversity, companies that have good biodiversity records will have a significant advantage over those that do not. A company’s biodiversity record will influence its ability to access land, sea and other natural resources essential for its operations, as well as its ability to obtain both the legal and social right to operate in an area. It will also affect a company’s access to capital and insurance, particularly given that impact on biodiversity loss is increasingly being recognized as a material risk for business by investors, financial institutions and insurance companies. For retailers and other companies that interact directly with the public, having a good biodiversity record will also facilitate access to consumer markets, particularly as consumer awareness about the importance of biodiversity increases. In all industries, a good record may also help to attract and retain high quality employees. In addition, for industries that depend on biodiversity, its components, or the ecosystem services supported by biodiversity, biodiversity loss is a production risk that could lead to insecure supply chains, decreased productivity, unreliable service, and poor product quality. In such industries, companies that minimize their negative impacts on biodiversity and invest in ecosystem healthare helping to guarantee the sustainability of their businesses.” Source & © CBD Related publication:
Other Figures & Tables on this publication: Table 3.1 Strategic Plan scorecard Table 2.1 Headline indicators for assessing progress towards the 2010 Biodiversity Target † Figure 1.1 Biodiversity, ecosystem functioning, ecosystem services, and drivers of change Figure 2.11 Change the Marine Trophic Index (early 1950s to the present) Figure 2.13 Estimates of forest fragmentation due to anthropogenic causes Figure 2.19 Intensity of ecological footprint Figure 4.1 Main direct drivers of change in biodiversity and ecosystems Box 3.3 Principles, guidelines and other tools developed under the Convention Box 1.1 The role of biodiversity in mitigating the impacts of natural disasters Box 1.2 Contribution of ecosystem goods and services to national economies Box 1.3 Millennium Development Goals Box 2.1 Headline indicators for assessing progress towards the 2010 Biodiversity Target Box 3.1 The Ecosystem Approach Box 3.2 Programmes of work of the Convention Box 3.4 The biodiversity-related conventions Box 3.5 The business case for biodiversity Box 4.1Summary of the main findings on biodiversity of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Box 4.2 Policy options for the 2010 Biodiversity Target and beyond Box 4.3 Elements of a strategy to reduce biodiversity loss Box 5.1 Checklist of key actions for 2010 Figure 1.2 Economic benefits under alternative management practices Figure 2.1 Annual net change in forest area by region (1990–2005) Figure 2.3 Change in live coral cover across the Caribbean basin (1977-2002) Figure 2.5 Trends in European common birds in farmland and forest habitats Figure 2.7 Trends in terrestrial surface under protected areas Figure 2.10 Trends in mean trophic levels of fisheries landings (1950-2000) Figure 2.15 Global trends in the creation of reactive nitrogen on Earth by human activity Figure 2.18 Global Ecological Footprint Figure 2.20 Aid activities targeting CBD objectives from 16 developed countries (1998-2003) Figure 3.1 Participation in Convention processes |