The source document for this Digest states:
Non-carcinogenic effects
A plethora of effects have been reported to occur in multiple animal studies following exposure to PCDDs, PCDFs and PCBs. The most extensive dataset on dose-response effects is available for 2,3,7,8-TCDD; less information is available for the other dioxin-like compounds. Therefore the focus of the evaluation of the animal data is on the effects of 2,3,7,8-TCDD.
Due to the multitude of different effects at various dose levels the most sensitive toxic and biochemical endpoints are presented in Table 1. In this table information on the lowest daily doses or body burdens resulting in the observed effects are included. The effects observed are each characterized either as an adverse (toxic) effect or as a biochemical and functional effect. The biochemical effects observed at the lowest body burdens, or tissue concentrations are early expressions of cascades of events induced by dioxin-like compounds that may or may not result in adverse effects in the animal or its progeny.
Among the most sensitive endpoints (on a body burden basis) are: endometriosis, developmental neurobehavioral (cognitive) effects, developmental reproductive (sperm counts, female urogenital malformations) effects, and immunotoxic effects, both adult and developmental . The most sensitive biochemical effects are CYP1A1/2 induction, EGF-receptor down-regulation and oxidative stress (Table 1).
The lowest doses giving rise to statistically significant effects in the most sensitive endpoints following exposure, have resulted in body burdens (e.g. 3 to 73 ng of TCDD/kg) in the exposed animals that overlap, at the lower end, the range of body burdens expressed as TEQ that are found in the general population in industrialized countries exposed to background levels of PCDDs, PCDFs and PCBs.
Source & ©: WHO-IPCS
re-evaluation of the Tolerable Daily Intake (TDI) page 7
Effect | Species | Exposure (LOEL or LOAEL) | Maternal body burden (increment to background)* |
* Background body burden in rats and mice is about 4 ng/kg (TEQ)s ** Body burden at the end of dosing period *** Note: single dose | |||
Adverse effects | |||
Developmental effects | |||
- neurotoxicity (object learning) | Rhesus monkey | ~160 pg/kg/d | 42 ng/kg** |
Reproductive toxicity | rat | ||
- decreased sperm count | 64,000 pg/kg*** | 28 ng/kg** | |
- vaginal threads | 200,000 pg/kg*** | 73 ng/kg** | |
Immunotoxicity | rat | 100,000 pg/kg*** | 50 ng/kg** |
Immunological (viral sensitivity) | mouse | 10,000 pg/kg*** | 10 ng/kg** |
Hormonal (endometriosis) | Rhesus | ~160 pg/kg/d | 42 ng/kg** |
monkey | |||
Effects which may or may not lead to adverse effects | |||
Biochemical effects | |||
-CYP1A1 | mouse | 150 pg/kg/d | 3 ng/kg |
rat | 100 pg/kg/d | 3 ng/kg | |
-CYP1A2 | mouse | 450 pg/kg/d | 10 ng/kg |
-EGFR | rat | 100 pg/kg/d | 3 ng/kg |
-IL1beta | mouse | 300 pg/kg/d | ~10 ng/kg |
Functional effects | |||
-oxidative stress | mouse | 450 pg/kg/d | 10 ng/kg |
-lymphocyte subsets | marmoset | ~200 pg/kg/d | 6-8 ng/kg |
monkey | |||
Source & ©: WHO-IPCS
re-evaluation of the Tolerable Daily Intake (TDI) page 7
The source document for this Digest states:
Carcinogenic effects
2,3,7,8-TCDD has been shown to be carcinogenic in several chronic studies at multiple sites in multiple species in both sexes. Short-term studies observed a lack of direct DNA-damaging effects including covalent binding to DNA by TCDD, which underscores that TCDD is not acting as an initiator of carcinogenesis. However, secondary mechanisms may be important in the observed carcinogenicity of TCDD and related dioxin-like compounds.
The lowest observed adverse effect of TCDD in the Kociba study was the development of hepatic adenomas in rats at an intake of 10 ng/kg bw/day and the no observed effect level was 1 ng/kg/day. At the no observed effect level, body burdens were 60 ng TCDD/kg bw.
TCDD also causes thyroid tumours in male rats. This has been indicated to proceed through a mechanism which involves altered thyroid hormone metabolism, and consequent increases in feedback mechanisms (TSH) which results in a chronic proliferative stimulation of thyroid follicular cells.
Studies in the mouse skin support a lack of initiating activity and an ability to promote the growth of previously initiated lesions indicative of a promoting agent. Mouse skin tumour promotion indicates that the Ah receptor is involved in tumour promotion by TCDD. Extensive examination of liver tumour promotion in the female rat liver also supports a non-genotoxic mechanism for the induction of liver neoplasms by TCDD. The ability of TCDD to enhance proliferation and inhibit apoptotic processes in focal hepatic lesions further supports an indirect mechanism of carcinogenicity.
Several PCDDs, PCDFs, non-ortho and mono-ortho PCBs have also been shown to be tumour promoters.
Source & ©: WHO-IPCS
re-evaluation of the Tolerable Daily Intake (TDI) page 7-8
This summary is free and ad-free, as is all of our content. You can help us remain free and independant as well as to develop new ways to communicate science by becoming a Patron!