Languages:
The main aims of this report are:
Note: The term ‘hazardous substances’ is used throught this report in a broad sense, encompassing a.e. substances of very high concern as defined by the European regulation REACH on chemicals, the hazardous substances as defined by the OSPAR marine Convention (covering the North Atlantic Ocean and the North Sea) or the potentially wide-ranging list of substances for which EU Member States are to establish their own surface and groundwater standards.
This report focuses on some synthetic chemicals which are hazardous, raising concerns for human health and the environment depending on their pattern of use and the potential for exposure. These substances comprise a wide range of industrial and household chemicals, metals, pesticides and pharmaceuticals whilst, says the report, these synthetic chemicals clearly bring important benefits to society. Certain types of naturally occurring chemicals, such as metals, can also be hazardous.
Emissions of hazardous substances to the environment can occur at every stage of their life cycle, from production, processing, manufacturing and use in downstream production sectors or by the general public to their eventual disposal. Hazardous substances are emitted to water bodies both directly and indirectly through a range of diffuse and point sources from a wide range of land-based and marine sources, including agriculture and aquaculture, industry, oil exploration, mining activities, transport, shipping and waste disposal, as well as our own homes. Sources include their production in industrial activities of course but also their uses in urban environment, agriculture, mining, landfills and contaminated areas.
For example, whilst household and industrial wastewater treatment has been implemented progressively across Europe, the process does not remove all and completely hazardous substances. Household and industrial chemicals and pharmaceuticals, for example are still detected in treated effluents that are subsequently discharged to surface waters. In addition, concern regarding chemical contamination arising from the exploitation of shale gas has grown recently.
The risks of detrimental effects on aquatic biota at all levels (molecular, cellular, tissue, organ and ecosystem level), depends on the concentration of hazardous substances in fresh and marine waters and associated biota including sediments1 .
From a socio economic point of view, such impacts also diminish the services provided by aquatic ecosystems, and consequently the revenue that can be derived from them. Laboratory studies have shown that the combined effects of chemicals upon aquatic life can be additive resulting in observable detrimental effects even if these are present, individually, at levels below which any adverse effects can be detected.
Human exposure to hazardous man-made chemicals has been implicated in a range of chronic diseases, including cancer as well as reproductive and developmental impairment. The risk of adverse effects, like for the environment, depends on the level of exposure to these substances1. Such exposure can be linked to the ingestion of contaminated drinking water and the consumption of contaminated freshwater fish and seafood.
For several hazardous substances in the seas around Europe, the exceedance of regulatory limits in seafood is documented, says the report. For example, whilst human exposure to mercury in the Arctic, through the consumption of marine food, has declined, concentrations in the blood of more than 75 % of women sampled in Greenland in 2007 were still exceeding US guideline levels.
There are also concerns regarding potential health effects arising from human exposure via various pathways to a mixture of chemicals, found in the most polluted water bodies of Europe. In particular, the presence of hazardous substances in drinking water supplies also requires their removal. A key measure for reducing the level of contamination required for Europe’s drinking water, says the report, is the establishment of safeguard or protection zones around the source of water used for human consumption associated to regulatory measures to control and reduce polluting activities.
For the difference between hazard an rsk see the short animation video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZmNZi8bon8
In many cases, declining trends of contamination are observed. In the North-East Atlantic, concentrations of cadmium, DDT, lead, lindane and PCBs were all declining, reflecting the decrease loads from rivers. In the Baltic Sea, reports also indicate declining trends for lindane while other sources indicate declining trends in PCBs in herring, perch and mussels in several locations. The banning of the anti-fouling agent tri-butyl tin (TBT) has led to clear downward trends of concentrations in marine snails in the North Atlantic region and in the Baltic Sea.
For some hazardous substances like mercury, tributyltin and poly-aromatic hydrocarbons, which are hydrophobic and tend to accumulate in sediment and biota, their concentrations in these organic matrices are likely to be higher and, therefore, more detectable and measurable than in water and, the risk to the aquatic environment may be underestimated when the measurements are made only in the water.
Although regulation has led to documented reductions in the emissions of such substances to air and water as the presence of many is a legacy of past use), their persistence and ubiquity, particularly in sediment and biota, mean that they continue to pose a risk to aquatic environments even at sites far from human activity.
Data show however that a series of hazardous substances could still be found at high concentrations, among others, in three of the European seas. In the case of DDT, hexchlorobenzene (HCB), lindane and PCBs, given that all four are now banned within Europe since many years, this observation reflects their long persistence in the aquatic environment. In certain locations, some metal concentrations also were exceeding the maximum levels set by the E.U. legislation. A further harmonization at EU level is, therefore, desirable, says the report.
Some more recent types of “emerging pollutants” include substances that have existed for some time, such as pharmaceuticals and personal care products, but also relatively new substances, such as nanomaterials. For such substances, awareness and an understanding, still currently incomplete, of their potential effects have developed only recently and their inclusion in routine monitoring programmes has so far been limited, making it difficult to robustly assess the risks to the environment and human health, and thus to justify regulation and better monitoring.
Targeted monitoring of selected emerging pollutants across the EU would thus be desirable to ensure timely awareness of potentially problematic substances that might need to be regulated. This monitoring should be supported by European research studies.
Climate change will add a further layer of complexity in the question of hazardous substances in Europe’s fresh and marine waters. This phenomenon is likely to adversely affect chemical water quality over the coming decades in the absence of appropriately strong measures. In regions where more intense rainfall is expected, the frequency and severity of polluted urban storm flows is predicted to increase, whilst the flushing to water of agricultural pollutants, including pesticides and veterinary medicines, may be exacerbated.
Hotter, drier summers and increasingly severe and frequent droughts will deplete river flows, reducing contaminant dilution capacity and leading to elevated concentrations of hazardous substances. Rising water temperatures and other stressors associated with climate change may interact with hazardous substances to impact the immune system health of aquatic organisms.
Ocean acidification, driven by increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2 in water becomes carbonic acid), may change the speciation of metals in seawater and, therefore, their interaction with marine organisms. In addition, coastal erosion — likely to be also intensified by climate change — may lead to the exposure of historical landfill sites along the coastlines of Europe, releasing hazardous substances to their coastal waters.
For many hazardous substances, information on industrial emissions to water must be reported under the European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register (E-PRTR). To date, however, reporting under E-PRTR is still incomplete as to the spatial extent and temporal resolution of data describing emissions to water — markedly so, for some substances. It is important also to improve the quantitative understanding of the sources, emissions and pathways of all hazardous substances significantly. Advances in this area will facilitate the identification of appropriate measures to address chemical pollution of aquatic environments.
Whilst controls ‘at source’ are desirable, it is very likely that other measures to attenuate the emission of hazardous substances to water will remain essential, says the report. Such measures include advanced wastewater treatment, urban storm water controls and specific agro-environmental practices such as riparian buffer strips. Reducing emissions of hazardous substances has been shown to yield economic and societal benefits. A range of other measures can be implemented to reduce the emission of hazardous substances to water. It encompasses product substitution, restrictions on marketing and use, requirements to demonstrate the implementation of clean production processes and “best available techniques” (BAT) in applications for industrial permits, fiscal instruments, the setting of emissions and environmental quality standards, and action to raise public awareness.
To address these issues, recent European research studies have led to the development and testing of new assessment and modelling tools that help to link chemical contamination with observed deterioration of ecological quality. Such tools include approaches to evaluate existing chemical and biological monitoring data, together with site-specific experimental techniques to establish cause-effect relationships. Indeed, it is not practical or affordable to sample and analyze at sufficient spatial and temporal resolution for hundreds of individual chemicals within fresh and marine waters, including aquatic biota and sediments. However, the focus upon a few pre selected priority substances bears a strong risk of missing other problematic substances. In addition, such an approach disregards the effects of chemical mixtures.
Further development of biological effects tools integrated with analytical chemistry is desirable and could contribute, in due course, to the identification of substances associated with risks. European research funds can play an important role in the further development of these tools.
The European Union has introduced a range of relatively recent legislations to address the use of chemicals and their emissions to the environment, including water.
The Regulation on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), adopted in 2006 and designed to improve the protection of human health and the environment from the risks posed by chemicals, has a key role to play in this respect. The REACH Regulation attributes greater responsibility to industry with regard to managing these risks and providing safety information on substances used. The Regulation also calls for the progressive substitution of the most dangerous chemicals once suitable alternatives have been identified.
Nowadays, the chemical quality of E.U. surface waters is primarily addressed by the recently adopted Environmental Quality Standards Directive (EQS Directive) which defines concentration limits for pollutants of EU-wide relevance known as “priority ubstances” (PSs).
Some of these pollutants have been designated as “priority hazardous substances” (PHSs) due to their toxicity, their persistence in the environment and their bioaccumulation in plant and animal tissues for which the EQS Directive requires cessation or phase-out of discharges, emissions and losses of priority hazardous substances. Other substances identified as being of concern at local, river basin or national level, standards have to be set at national level. Compliance with this requirement is critical, underlines the report.
Abatement measures established under the EU Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC) Directive have also contributed to a decline in metal emissions to water and air. For example, , whilst legislation relating to the production, use and disposal of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) has resulted in declines in their concentrations found in marine biota. A similar outcome has resulted from the banning of tributyltin (TBT) in anti-fouling paints due to its endocrine-disrupting impacts on marine invertebrates, although high levels in marine sediments can still be observed in certain locations.
Efforts to promote a more sustainable consumption and production of chemicals require a mix of policy responses, including regulation, economic incentives, information-based instruments and a wider implementation of ‘green chemistry’. This would not only benefit Europe’s environment, says then report, but also reduce the detrimental effects arising in other parts of the world as a result of the growing proportion of goods imported to Europe.
This approach involves developing new processes and technologies that maintain the quality of a product but reduce or eliminate the use and generation of hazardous substances.
The adoption of sustainable, green chemistry techniques has been shown to generate financial benefits and hence provide competitive advantage. Currently, however, there is no comprehensive EU legislation on sustainable chemistry in place.
This summary is free and ad-free, as is all of our content. You can help us remain free and independant as well as to develop new ways to communicate science by becoming a Patron!
BECOME A PATRON!