Context - The growing use of energy that underlies current economic growth puts unsustainable pressure on natural resources and on the environment.
What options do we have for switching to a cleaner and more efficient energy future? How much will it cost? And what policies could achieve this?
This Digest is a faithful summary of the leading scientific consensus report produced in 2008 by the International Energy Agency (IEA): "
The projected substantial growth in the global economy between 2008 and 2050 implies an increase in energy needs. Unsustainable pressures on the environment and on natural resources are inevitable if energy demand remains closely coupled with economic growth and if fossil fuel demand is not reduced.
Over the last two years, global carbon dioxide CO2 emissions and oil demand have continued to increase steadily. “Business-as-usual” projections foresee a 70% increase in oil demand and a 130% rise in CO2 emissions by 2050. Such an increase in CO2 emissions could raise global average temperatures by 6°C or more, resulting in significant impacts on all aspects of life and irreversible changes in the natural environment.
A dramatic shift is needed in government energy policies, ensuring longer-term planning on which industries can rely. International cooperation among all major economies will also be crucial, bearing in mind that a large proportion of future CO2 emissions are likely to come from the developing world. More...
Two sets of scenarios assess the efforts needed to either stabilize CO2 emissions at the level they were in 2005, or reduce them to 50% of that level by 2050. More...
2.1 The ACT scenarios aim to bring back CO2 emissions to 2005 levels by 2050. This difficult and costly goal implies the adoption of a wide range of existing clean technologies, plus the deployment of some newer technologies, such as CO2 capture and storage (CCS). Additional investments in the energy sector of roughly 0.4% of global gross domestic product each year between now and 2050 would be needed. More...
2.2 Reducing CO2 emissions to 2005 levels is not enough to limit global warming to 2 - 2.4 °C, a level that would prevent the most severe consequences. The BLUE scenarios aim to prevent global warming from exceeding this temperature range by bringing emission levels down, by 2050, to a level that is half what they were in 2005. This even more difficult and costly goal requires urgent implementation of unprecedented new energy policies, the widespread deployment of technologies still under development, and additional investments in the energy sector that could reach 1.1% of global GDP each year between now and 2050. More...
2.3 These required additional investments do not represent net costs, because technology investments in energy efficiency, in many renewable energy sources and in nuclear power all reduce fossil fuel requirements. In fact, in both ACT and BLUE scenarios, the estimated total undiscounted fuel cost savings for coal, oil and gas consumers over the period to 2050 are greater than the additional investment required. More...
2.4 In addition to their environmental benefits, the scenarios also show a more balanced outlook for oil markets. More...
Energy efficiency improvements in buildings, appliances, transport, industry and power generation represent the largest and least costly area for reducing CO2 emissions. Next are the measures to produce energy through renewable sources, nuclear power, and CO2 capture and storage (CCS) technologies. Action in all these areas is urgent and necessary. More...
3.1 Substantially lowering the energy consumption of buildings – with building insulation, heat pumps, solar heating and highly-efficient appliances and lighting among others – is essential in both ACT and BLUE scenarios. While the ACT scenarios can use technologies that are widely available today, the BLUE scenarios call for new and emerging technologies. More...
3.2 For power generation and industry, the deployment of CCS is the single most important new technology for avoidance of CO2 emissions in both ACT and BLUE scenarios, before renewable sources and nuclear power. A massive switch to renewable sources of energy such as wind, solar and biomass is needed, and nuclear power also needs to play an increasingly important role. Given the broad range of possible energy mixes, countries have various options for reducing CO2 emissions from the power sector. More...
3.3 The transport sector represents, by far, the largest area of additional investment in both ACT and BLUE scenarios. Major improvements in the efficiency of conventional vehicles are needed, with biofuels, hybrid and hydrogen technologies also playing a role. More...
3.4 Industries account for more than one-third of global energy use and CO2 emissions. They have a good record of energy efficiency gains in recent years, driven by the need to manage energy costs, but great potential exists for further efficiency gains. However, very large CO2 emission reductions from this sector are hard to achieve and need significant investments to upgrade industrial plants and deploy CCS technology. More...
Some of the technologies needed to reach the targets set in the most ambitious scenarios are not yet available, and many others require further refinement and cost reductions. A huge effort of research, development, and demonstration (RD&D) is therefore urgently needed, both in the public and the private sector. It is estimated that the public sector needs to increase research and development investments by as much as ten times the current amounts.
The large-scale demonstration of the technical and economical feasibility of new technologies, such as CO2 capture and storage in coal plants, also urgently requires significant public sector support.
In addition, the basic sciences of physics, chemistry and geology also need to be enhanced because they are fundamental to technology in which important breakthroughs are possible. More...
Most new technologies have higher costs than established ones, but it is only through their deployment that costs can be reduced and the product adapted to the market. Governments must enhance deployment programmes, especially for technologies with the greatest potential such as biofuels and solar energy. More...
5.1 To overcome barriers to technology deployment, strict efficiency regulations for buildings, appliances and vehicles are essential in all scenarios. Public acceptance of the standards that are necessary to achieve very low-energy and zero-energy buildings and a four-fold reduction in the CO2 emissions of vehicles will be critical. More...
5.2 Private-sector investment is – and will remain – the primary facilitator of technology deployment and diffusion. There is an urgent need to design and implement a range of policy measures that will create clear, predictable, long-term economic incentives for CO2 reduction in the market. Only on this basis will business be able to take the steps needed and confidently undertake the huge investment programmes required. More...
5.3 Governments will need to lead public opinion by making the connection between the widely recognized urgent need to address climate change and the specific projects required which could face public opposition. More...
International collaboration is essential to accelerate the development and global deployment of sustainable energy technologies in the most efficient way. Networks in which numerous technology experts from around the world co-ordinate their energy technology programmes already exist. These networks need strong international leadership from policy makers at the highest level.
In order to reach the global targets set into the ACT and BLUE scenarios, the International Energy Agency (IEA) has identified seventeen key technologies for energy efficiency, power generation and transport and, for each, has drawn a roadmap that describes the actions required to deliver their potential. These roadmaps are developed in the full “Energy Technology Perspectives 2008” report. More...
Supply side | Demand side |
---|---|
|
|
This summary is free and ad-free, as is all of our content. You can help us remain free and independant as well as to develop new ways to communicate science by becoming a Patron!